On Tue, 10 May 2005, ed wrote: > I don't want a single system that could fail, and I don't want a huge > hardware budget, even if it takes me 4 months to find a solution it's > more worthwhile as I can apply it to other internal requirements where > data is possibly brought down through a single failure.
What we do here is put e-mail in each users' disk volume -- each user volume has a Mail, home, and pub directory in it, with appropriate ACLs. User volumes are spread over many servers, and the multiple POP/IMAP and SMTP servers mount AFS using the client. Loss of one user volume server takes a fraction of folks offline, but loss of one mail reader / delivery server doesn't affect anyone (except the admins...) other than a bit slower response. Steve Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
