On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 09:03:30AM -0400, Kris Van Hees wrote: > I can confirm I saw the same behaviour with 1.3.82 a few days ago, when I > was doing some unrelated testing. Haven't had time to track down the > problem yet though. Given that it is still present in 1.3.84, I'll have a > look at it (if someone else doesn't get to it first).
Hmmm. Bumping up the chunksize (to 20) seems to have done something: AFS using 5085868 of the cache's available 8388608 1K byte blocks. I guess I need to go back and reread the recent thread on better default options.... -- Matthew Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> Current office temperature: 80 degrees Fahrenheit. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
