All good questions, with no immediate answers. >tgc:The book "Managing AFS" by Campbell is out of print and should really be replaced by an "OpenAFS, Operation and Maintenance Manual".
Perhaps there are some other suggestions? >tgc:I'd rather see raw content produced over form. It won't be by the developers since they're buried with work. TXT or html files are OK with me, the conversion to Latex is simple. So, I take it this a matter of text conversion? >tgc: Actually the publications are compiled from Latex source in a batch process. How do the docs get checked out of and back into CVS? >tgc: I can set a CVS site up if openafs doesn't. Who gives the approval before new editions or formats are released to the public? >tgc: Good question. Since the docs are in Latex/pdf/html format using a collaborative review and comment system pretty much limits us to using Adobe, unless pdf's are used with Chapter/Section/line numbers. This is somewhat archaic but would suffice. The developers are the only people with the knowledge to review... Could someone interested in this get write access to an AFS directory on openafs.org? >tgc: Jaltman?? Michael _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
