Jeffrey Altman wrote:
Douglas E. Engert wrote:
I believe that the pam_krb5 and pam_afs* should not be integrated,
on any system, as (I have said in the past.) Having them seperate allows
one to use the vendor's pam_krb5.
I believe that OpenAFS should have a version of pam_afs2 or something
like it as part of the standard distribution. pam_krb5 should be
considered out of scope for OpenAFS.
Yes, I agree, and am willing to submit the pam_afs2 to OpenAFS as a start.
Jeffrey Altman
--
Douglas E. Engert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Argonne National Laboratory
9700 South Cass Avenue
Argonne, Illinois 60439
(630) 252-5444
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
