In an out-of-band discussion, Jeffrey Altman has managed to convince me (not an easy task mind you!) that Transarc AFS servers are more likely the cause of our NAT troubles with AFS clients. For this reason I'm amending my initial statement to say that if you access Transarc AFS servers, you should not put AFS clients behind a NAT.
This is apparently due to IBM/Transarc AFS servers' UUID tracking not behaving correctly when multiple clients come from the same IP. Since others here have tested OpenAFS servers from behind a NAT and had no issues, I assume it works fine unless multiple users behind the NAT access an AFS cell running Transarc servers. Regards, Lester Barrows _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
