Hi Derek, On Thursday 22 September 2005 12:21 pm, Derek Atkins wrote: > Oh, amd64! I don't recall that being stated before! That's the > issue. GLibc on amd64 doesn't export res_search in the same way as > x86. Honestly, I think we can probably just remove the res_search > checks, we really don't use it, as far as I know.
Great, I'd been working on this for a bit before someone made note of it here and had already "fixed" that. Definitely better that the check is removed than my solution. > ... What's your rpmbuild command-line, and what does it print > out at the beginning of the build process? It should print out a > dozen lines describing the build environment. Can you cut-and-paste > those here? > > -derek Note that I edited the spec file, but that was just a few sed lines that modify res_search in a few files and my attempt to disable krb5 to see if the issue would go away. I can send it to you directly if you want to see what mess I may have made of it. The command I used to build from the spec file follows, along with the lines from the build process: rpmbuild -ba openafs.spec + : @@@ + : @@@ kernel version: 2.4.21-32.EL + : @@@ kernel modules dir: /lib/modules/2.4.21-32.EL + : @@@ kernel source dir: /lib/modules/2.4.21-32.EL/build + : @@@ kernel variations: up smp + : @@@ PAM modules dir: /lib64/security + : @@@ build userspace: 1 + : @@@ build modules: 1 + : @@@ arch: x86_64 + : @@@ target cpu: x86_64 + : @@@ It all looks ok, but when the modules are built it ends up adding the extra numbers to the library name. I haven't had much time to find where it's added just yet, it may well be something I'm doing wrong. Regards, Lester Barrows _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
