On 11/22/05, David Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Read carefully. I attended an NFSv4 presentation at a technical conference, > and found out that some of the NFSv4 features were added specifically to > compete with afs; however, the implementation is in the spec as "optional", > and, in fact, none of the existing NFSv4 implementations have them.
Hmm, troubling. I'll keep this in mind. Come to think of it, this might explain why I've been getting conflicting stories with regards to some of the features. Thanks, Noel _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
