Leroy Tennison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I noticed a link to Arla on the website. Going to it, I see references > to an apparently different open source implementation of afs. What I > didn't see was an explanation of their reason for existence separate > from OpenAFS. Can anyone explain to me how they are different? Thanks.
Arla has a considerably different architecture that does far more of the client work in a user-space daemon. As such, it's easier to port to new architectures, but the implementation isn't as complete in some other ways (particularly in server support and client command-line utilities). -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
