Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Neither. That message is relatively normal and is perfectly safe to ignore. > The tainting is due to the fact that the Linux Developers don't consider > the IPL a "valid" open source license.
It's not GPL compatible, which is, I think, the point. David _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
