Stephan Wiesand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Derek Atkins wrote:
>> You don't want AFS for an imap or maildir backend. You should just > Since it's void of any locks, what would be wrong with maildir in AFS? AFS is optimized for read (or pessimized for write, depending on which way you want to think about it and how kind you want to be). For mail delivery, you want a system that can handle a high volume of writes, and the AFS callback mechanism isn't ideal for this. You can do it, but I doubt you'll be happy with the performance in the long run, unless your needs are fairly limited. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
