Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hm, I'm not sure that anything like that *could* exist. The RFCs are > concerned with the on-the-wire protocol; locally configured mappings would > be outside their scope. MIT Kerberos and Heimdal are different > implementations that could well use different logic. Shishi is yet > another implementation with its own logic. Microsoft might do something > else. > > I don't think this is the kind of area where you are going to get that > sort of document.
*sigh* This keeps reminding me of the Bad Old Days of hosts.txt before we had DNS... Manually distributing mapping files just isn't the way to go... - a _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
