On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 10:08:31AM +0100, Horst Birthelmer wrote: > ... and, Samba and AFS are as secure or unsecure as the admins make > it. The question is how much work you would have to do, to make it > secure, but that's completely beyond the point.
The only real thing you can't get with SMB native is transport encryption. Transport signing is there, you _can_ nail down auth to just krb (losing functionality, but what can you do, you have windows clients). Everything else is comparable. Volker
pgpEz7qrfpOdi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
