On Mar 11, 2006, at 12:58 PM, ph rhole oper wrote:
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 12:17:43 +0100, "Horst Birthelmer"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
...
I know that kind of problem and if you're in a position to stop the
cell you can work around it easily.
This is for adding a new database server to a one server cell.
...
5. stop the old database server
Can i just leave the old database server on, so i can have two
database
servers for redundancy (this at least should be working..)
You talked about migrating to a new database and file server.
At least that's what I understood.
Of course you can have more than one. You can have any number of
servers in AFS, only for database servers numbers above a certain
amount just don't make sense.
...
I just thought that the ubik synchronization would be much more
straightforward..im kind of dissapointed if
everytime i'll have to do something like this..
It usually is a lot easier.
Database servers aren't migrated 'all the time' anyway. :-)
That's why I sent that off list with a note that it's a quick and
dirty workaround ;-)
I actually didn't want that in the archives.
Horst
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
