I'm opposed to nested includes because it makes it difficult to diagnose include ordering violations but I realize that's a losing battle.
I actually wonder why hardly anybody uses the '%I' format instead which util/snprintf.c understands - perhaps because a move to IPv6 (if ever) would be more complicated? I suspect snprintf was added after most of these callers were written to use inet_ntoa. They could safely be changed now but no one has bothered. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
