Thanks to everyone who responded.  I thoroughly appreciate it.

To clarify a few points...

1. We currently have three cell servers. We are shutting down one of the cell servers and moving it (creating a new one) to/in another building under a new name and IP. I believe the process outlined by Jeffrey Hutzelman and Marcus Watts should be sufficient for this change. Thanks.

2. I'm curious as to why no one responded to the problem with xlock and xscreensavers relating to PAM, K5 tickets, and tokens. Is this some kind of state secret, or are we the only ones with the problem? To summarize again...

On Linux the xscreensaver runs as the user but appears to be started by init. When the screen is locked, then unlocked, the PAM module generates a new Kerberos 5 ticket, but doesn't use the correct ticket cache. It seems to always create a new ticket cache. Curious as to why this was happening, we killed xscreensaver and set the KRB5CCNAME variable, then restarted xscreensaver thinking it would then use the correct KRB5CCNAME, but again, it generated a new ticket cache. At this point xlock and screensaver is just broken. Note: I'm a Windows guy, so I'm getting all this from our Linux sysadmin.

3. At least one of you suggested that version 1.4.xx (pre-rc10) has problems and that we should not use it on the cell servers, or for that matter the file servers either. Here I must say that we are in no good mood to use any "betas" or "release candidates". If I had emailed my questions a few weeks later, someone may have responded that pre-rc44 (sarcasm) might have problems too. It sounds to me like we should just stay with 1.2.13 for the immediate future. Does anyone have any words on when "the" true production copy of OpenAFS beyond 1.2.13 will see the light of day?

4. I gather from the responses that we need a "special" AKLOG to remove the need for the 5 to 4 daemon in a pure K5 environment. I'm unsure what is meant here by "special". I mean the OpenAFS Windows client ships with AKLOG. Is it special? Is the Linux version "special"? This is cause for concern, and leads me to believe that getting rid of the 5 to 4 service is literally never going to happen, so using pure K5 tickets is just more or less techno-fluff experimentation for now. The issues seem to be...

a. We need a special AKLOG. Ok, is there one for Windows? Linux? Solaris?, OSX?, etc? b. Do all the PAMs for various OSs support this "special" feature? Or do the PAMs just system out to an existing AKLOG?

Thanks again,

Rodney

_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info

Reply via email to