On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Frederic Gilbert wrote:
Derrick J Brashear wrote:
On the other hand, we found out that one can apply "fs sa" on a
directory, even if he is not in the ACL table, and even if he is not the
directory's owner, but if he is the owner of the mounting point of the
volume where the directory resides.
The latter behavior was always true. the change to the former is new in
1.4, i don't remember the rationale but it was discussed on the list.
Thank you for your answer.
I tried to look for the discussion on -info and -devel with some obvious
keywords, but did not found it (I will try my luck again later).
However, unless I missed something again, the files documenting "fs setacl"
in openafs-1.4.{1,2}-doc.tar.gz always speak only about directory's owner
(the three lines in my original post), which is confusing.
I'm not arguing your point. We should fix one or the other, though, I'm
not sure which. I will try to find the discussion.
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
