Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > ted creedon wrote: >> Have openafs users been affected by >> http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda/fy2006/m06-16.pdf ? > > Anyone who is a "Fed" (or a Fed contractor) has had to deal > with that memo, and address the issues (quite some time > ago, actually). Primarily, the point is to insure there is > not another VA incident (loss of PII). If your agency has > to deal with this, there are a number of interesting > interpretations available via your favorite beltway bandit > regarding the actual steps needed to fully comply(*). I do > not recall that OpenAFS had any special advantages or > disadvantages in addressing the compliance issues for this > memorandum, but your agency compliance officers may have a > different point of view, and are the officials to ask for > definitive answers. > > Gary > > (*) For those that are not conversant in Fed-speak (and > for those who try to avoid it), Fed memos do not > always say what you think they say. Common English > interpretations of the words written do not always > result in the correct (in Fed-speak) interpretations. > You often need one of the consultant firms to > provide the guidance as to how they will actually > be interpreted and measured against. > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenAFS-info mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info > I was curious because I've supplied laptops and SCADA software for a power plant at a Missile Defense Site. There's less than zero chance the laptops could be stolen or lost.
Needless to say no one is concerned and I am just curious. Is any file data for the win AFS client left resident on the hard drive? Thanks. Tedc _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
