Richard Human <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So we're looking at open-afs. We are thinking of a situation where we
> have a cell of 2+ servers on the back-end with our data spread over a
> number of volumes, that we can move around. This takes care of the
> scalability issue. For redundancy we would investigate the volume
> replication feature.

You are aware that AFS replication is for read-only data?  You MUST 
write to the read-write volume and then vos release the data to the RO 
clones.

<<CDC 


_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info

Reply via email to