On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote:

> dont bother with lint.  just collect the warnings.  anything about
> implicit is likely bad news on 64-bit.  after than, any casting to/from
> wrong size integers is possibly bad.  afs has a habit of casting
> int's to void * and back again which is safe.  that was the bulk of
> the work getting the ia64 client to run 64-bit.

Lint is just too slow at this point.  only 4353 warnings, and only 2095 of
them are implicit.. :) that is down from xmas break. =-)



--------------------------------------
  Sean O'Malley, Information Technologist
  Michigan State University
-------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info

Reply via email to