On Friday, April 06, 2007 08:12:12 PM -0700 ted creedon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Depends who is smart enough..
tedc
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derrick J Brashear
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 4:41 PM
To: 'OpenAFS-info'
Subject: RE: [OpenAFS] REMINDER: LAST DAY [AFS & Kerberos Best Practices
Workshop 2007: CFP Extended]
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, ted creedon wrote:
I'd like to see an Rx protocol talk.
Do 8 mailing lists all care?
No; in fact, Derrick's point is that 8 mailing lists do _not_ all care...
- openafs-announce and arla-announce don't care, and you shouldn't be
trying to post things to those lists that are not "announcements".
And by that I mean official announcements from people authorized to
post to those lists.
- [email protected] and heimdal-discuss don't care; those are Kerberos
related lists, and Kerberos doesn't use Rx.
- Given what you asked, openafs-info doesn't care either -- that list is
for discussions relevant to AFS users and administrators; topics of
interest only to developers and hackers belong on -devel.
- I don't think info-afs cares about _anything_ any more -- it's a fairly
dead list, and the workshop announcements are sent there only for
completeness.
So, that leaves a grand total of two lists that might care. Maybe.
The point is, wide-replying to an announcement is generally considered
impolite, because such replies typically reach far more people than care
about your question/comment/request/whatever. So, please don't do it.
-- Jeff
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
