Thanks very much, Derrick.
Now all I've got to figure out is why/how I managed to confuse so many
clients by removing one instance of a multiply replicated volume.
Question: Does the AFS client do anything different with VLDB entries
marked "Old release" or "Old release erroneously available?"
Would a client refuse to use a site so marked?
Fishing here.
Kim
Derrick J Brashear wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Kim Kimball wrote:
Would someone please refresh my memory.
ISTR that AFS volume location information is refreshed by the AFS
client every hour, but recent events lead me to below that it is two
hours.
It's 2 hours.
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info