Kim Kimball wrote:
> Yesterday I removed one of multiple instances of root.cell.readonly
> (from file server X) and one of multiple instances of root.afs.readonly
> (from file server X also.)
> 
> Almost exactly two hours later a number of AFS clients could not access
> /afs and/or /afs/<local cell>, and the number of affected clients
> increased over the next thirty minutes or so.
> 
> My expectation was that the clients would adjust to the removal of one
> instance of the ROs.  They apparently did not.
> 
> I mounted <local cell> from a client in a different cell -- one that
> most likely did not have any volume location information from <local
> cell> and confirmed that all AFS volumes were on line and available -- I
> was able to walk the tree mounted to <localcell>:root.afs
> 
> To clear up the confusion on the client side I restarted (I sure like
> fast restart) all file servers and we returned to normal within five
> minutes.

Which client operation system and version?


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to