Derrick J Brashear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> For argument's sake, let's assume only a single front-end (imapd) >> machine.
> That's not especially dangerous, then. the worst risk is screwing with > Cyrus' idea of the universe if a volume goes away under it, like, in > particular i'm uncertain we ever audited cyrus to see if it handled > write failures correctly in every case, Ok, but this should be no worse than (a misguided effort at) running cyrus out of NFS, right? > I suppose I should say the locking semantics we have do make having > multiple front ends dangerous. Sure, I can see that. So, is it safe to say that running cyrus out of AFS is no more risky than running cyrus out of NFS? I think that would be a whole lot less mysterious. - a -- PGP/GPG: 5C9F F366 C9CF 2145 E770 B1B8 EFB1 462D A146 C380 _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
