fabrizio Manfredi wrote: > The strange things is on the write operation : > http://www.beolink.org/downloads/afs-performance/write-speed.jpg, > the difference btw case 2 and 3 is 50% of the speed. > > At the moment we didn't find a good reason for this performance reduction, we > have made many different test with different chunksize, but nothing is > changed. ..
CIFS operations frequently flush data to disk. In the case of the Samba-AFS gateway this will require a network operation. It is bound to be slower. You might want to consider a performance test between the OpenAFS for Windows client and the Samba AFS gateway. I would be interested in seeing the results. Jeffrey Altman Secure Endpoints Inc.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
