Oh, I see, you're doing "vos exa foo" and not "vos exa foo.readonly" and
getting the message "Dump only information ... blah"
Missed the earlier part of the discussion -- why is this an issue?
Kim
Steve Simmons wrote:
On Jul 19, 2007, at 7:10 PM, Kim Kimball wrote:
Why not restore the volume (restores to RW), replicate it (same
server and partition) and then remove the RW?
Mount the resulting readonly explicitly -- i.e. be sure to include
the .readonly suffix in the fs mkm
Works for me.
Works perfectly. Also gives the same error reports when you do a 'vos
examine' on it. Which is how this feature request got started.
Since then there's been further discussion here that leads me to think
a production read-only volume is a good idea. Think about forensics,
locking out users in cases of potential but unproven abuse, avoiding
per-file callbacks, etc, etc...
Steve
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
