Forgot reply-all again

On 8/1/07, Matthew Cocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The -p 128 flag alone has not solved the problem. I have a Filelog (from
> one locked up server) and rxdebug output from all servers at the time when
> lots locked up last night). They can be accessed via
>
>
> https://webdropoff.auckland.ac.nz/cgi-bin/pickup/6f25589961a37ad4d4a144bbd868058a/516290
> Interesting I started running cmdebug against all the clients that connect
> to our servers and I can see a lot of machines with the same UUID. I tried
> to apply the patch but it failed to add two of the chunks against 1.4.3source 
> in the rpm. The rejected file output was
>
> patch -p0 < ../../../UUID.patch
> patching file audit.c
> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] y
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 66 (offset 10 lines).
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 88.
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 114 (offset 6 lines).
> Hunk #5 succeeded at 144 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #6 succeeded at 181 (offset 10 lines).
> Hunk #7 FAILED at 223.
> Hunk #8 succeeded at 222 (offset -3 lines).
> 2 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file audit.c.rej
> less audit.c.rej
> ***************
> *** 88,98 ****
>             bufferPtr += sizeof(vaLong);
>             break;
>         case AUD_LST:           /* Ptr to another list */
> -           vaLst = (va_list)va_arg(vaList, va_list);
>             audmakebuf(audEvent, vaLst);
>             break;
>         case AUD_FID:           /* AFSFid - contains 3 entries */
> -           vaFid = (struct AFSFid *)va_arg(vaList, struct AFSFid *);
>             if (vaFid) {
> ***************
> *** 223,233 ****
>             fprintf(out, "LONG %d ", vaLong);
>             break;
>         case AUD_LST:           /* Ptr to another list */
> -           vaLst = va_arg(vaList, va_list);
>             printbuf(out, 1, "VALST", 0, vaLst);
>             break;
>         case AUD_FID:           /* AFSFid - contains 3 entries */
> -           vaFid = va_arg(vaList, struct AFSFid *);
>             if (vaFid)
>                 fprintf(out, "FID %u:%u:%u ", vaFid->Volume, vaFid->Vnode,
>                        vaFid->Unique);
> --- 223,233 ----
>             fprintf(out, "LONG %d ", vaLong);
>             break;
>         case AUD_LST:           /* Ptr to another list */
> +           vaLst = (char *)va_arg(vaList, int);
>             printbuf(out, 1, "VALST", 0, vaLst);
>             break;
>         case AUD_FID:           /* AFSFid - contains 3 entries */
> +           vaFid = (struct AFSFid *)va_arg(vaList, int);
>             if (vaFid)
>                 fprintf(out, "FID %u:%u:%u ", vaFid->Volume, vaFid->Vnode,
>                        vaFid->Unique);
>
>
>
> On 7/31/07, Derrick Brashear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > It's not really particularly useful.
> >
> > I do, however, have a suggestion.
> >
> > 1) up the number of threads to 128 (fileserver -p 128)
> > 2) apply the diff in RT ticket #19461, which i added to the ticket on
> > Mon Aug 08 14:49:12 2005
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to