Marcus Watts wrote:
Jason Edgecombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> had posted:
Christopher D. Clausen wrote:
Jason Edgecombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I compiled 1.4.4 on Mac OS X ppc Tiger with the supergroups option. I
seem to be getting weird behaviour from pts source. It seems to be
acting just like pts interactive. Am I doing something wrong?
Here is a log:
### I logged into afs as a regular user.
%cat /tmp/commands.txt
examine admin
quit
%./pts source -file /tmp/commands.txt
pts> quit
%./pts in < /tmp/commands.txt
Name: admin, id: 1, owner: system:administrators, creator: anonymous,
membership: 2, flags: S----, group quota: 20.
%
Can someone shed some light on this? Does my ptserver have to be
compiled with supergroups in order for pts source to work? I stumbled
over this while trying out the command so that I could write the man
page for it.
"pts in < command-file" is supposed to work just as in your
example.
"pts source -file /tmp/commands.txt" is broken. source is intended
to be a way to pull in files to supplment an interactive front-end, so
is supposed to be used something like this:
lancashire$ echo 'examine admin' > /tmp/commands.txt
lancashire$ pts in
pts> source /tmp/commands.txt
Name: admin, id: 2, owner: system:administrators, creator: bhoward,
membership: 21, flags: SOM--, group quota: unlimited.
pts> quit
lancashire$
Using "pts source" ought to work. I'm pretty sure I have a fixed
version somewhere, which I'll try to locate this weekend.
ok, your example works for me as well. I'm glad to know that it wasn't
just me. Andrew Deason filed bug #67547 and I hope that's fixed in the
next version.
I can confirm this behavior on 1.4.2 and 1.4.4 on i386_linux26. My
ptservers have supergroups enabled.
The command doesn't seem to exist in the Windows pts binaries.
Windws is built from some of the same source, but as best I can
determine, doesn't have real configuration support for options such
as "supergroups".
<<CDC
On a similar note, does pts interactive, sleep, quit and source need to
be in a supergroups ifdef?
I'm looking in src/ptserver/pts.c
#if defined(SUPERGROUPS)
ts = cmd_CreateSyntax("interactive", Interactive, 0,
"enter interactive mode");
add_std_args(ts);
cmd_CreateAlias(ts, "in");
interactive modes seems useful even without supergroups, what gives?
It's ifdef'd SUPERGROUPS for mainly historical reasons. It shouldn't
be ifdef'd at all.
Are there any objections to enabling pts interactive, sleep, quit, and
source for all compiles, not just supergroups?
Sincerely,
Jason
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
