On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 03:41:16PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: > Jose Calhariz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 11:25:03AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > >> Jose Calhariz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> > I have lost a fileserver because of a corruption on the reiserfs v3. > >> > Something like 1000 volumes and 100GB of data were lost. The backups > >> > were made using amanda with standard tar. > >> > >> > My problem is the recovering of the data to the surviving filesystem > >> > is taking too much time. Something like 7 hours to recover 7 GB. > >> > Will I need 100hours to recover from tar 100GB? > >> > >> What did you tar up? I can think of a lot of possibilities (the raw namei > >> filesystem, the contents of AFS archived with admin credentials, tarballs > >> of volume dumps), and the answer somewhat depends. > > > > I have tarballs with the contents of AFS using admin credentials. > > Note that you'll have to manually repair the acls; tar doesn't save > them.
It's on my todo list, to find a command to export and import AFS
acls. So it can be collected by tar.
>
> -derek
>
José Calhariz
--
P.S. [En_US] The sig below is from my random sig-generator, which strangely
often seems to pick signatures which are apropriate to the message at
hand!
P.S. [Pt_Pt] A assinatura em baixo é do gerador aleatório de
assinaturas, que estranhamente, escolhe com frequência assinaturas que
parecem apropriadas ao email!
--
Infeliz o povo que precisa de herois.
-- Bertold Brecht
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
