On Oct 24, 2007, at 9:54 , Steven Jenkins wrote:
On 10/24/07, Derrick Brashear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
the interesting case is where the RW has unreleased changes and
you want to
recreate the ROs as they are now. i don't know of distributed
tools to do
this.
I hadn't really thought about people intentionally keeping their RWs &
ROs out of sync w/each other. I'm not clear why someone would want to
do that -- could you elaborate?
Version control on the cheap: the R/O contains the publicly
supported version, the R/W is the development/testing one. When it's
tested and ready for deployment, release the volume.
--
brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
