On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 08:19:38PM -0500, Derrick Brashear wrote: > > And any openafs acceptance into any Linux distribution has better > > cards to be FHS than not. If openafs ever makes it into > > RHEL/Fedora proper it will have to be FHS style. > > If there's a chance of that, fine, but otherwise, change for the > sake of change is dumb.
I can't speak for RH, but I know there are some customers that want it and push towards this happening. Having something that is ready to be integrated makes it easier. But if/when RH wants to do that you'll know before anyone else - typically RH contacts lead deveopers of a project in private for integration purposes. (Although if it comes that far the kernel module bits will be merged into RH' kernel rpm and not shipped as a separate package, there is a kernel-module-outside-the-kernel-rpm phobia among the kernel packagers at RH) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
pgphLsgWVtujh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
