-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hey, Chas,
Sorry to bug. I've been looking at this, tangentially, because I've been working with bypassing dcache/memcache, writing direct into page cache. Pretty far along on that side of things. Is rx locking so coarse that in general only one read makes progress even independent of the cache--to your knowledge? Matt chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ia.net>,"Jerry Normandin" writes: >> write performance is actually impressive. file creation and deletion >> are very slow on afs. > > because writing is easier than reading. the afs cache manager can > group the outgoing writes together and send them in a single message. > while the cache manager has readahead it doesnt work because the afs > global locks blocks any progress the readahead thread might make. > _______________________________________________ > OpenAFS-info mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info - -- Matt Benjamin The Linux Box 206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 http://linuxbox.com tel. 734-761-4689 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHUEJRJiSUUSaRdSURCA2lAJ4p19x8OH8y2cYO3WERwapwdZ9gYwCffFeR t96QUFYv5yHK6wlFTbn9TSE= =BAnD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
