remove the openafs stuff from /Library/Receipts On Dec 8, 2007 3:53 PM, Alberto Paoluzzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 08/dic/07, at 19:41, Derrick Brashear wrote: > > > > On Dec 8, 2007 1:10 PM, Alberto Paoluzzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On 08/dic/07, at 18:42, Sergio Gelato wrote: > > > > > * Alberto Paoluzzi [2007-12-07 06:48:12 +0100]: > > >> In the past few weeks I disintalled openafs from the newbie leopard, > > >> due to high instability of my laptop; > > >> Yetsrday I reinstalled it, getting this error: > > >> > > >> > > >> Starting OpenAFS > > >> Loading AFS kernel extensions > > >> kextload: extension /var/db/openafs/etc/afs.kext is already loaded > > >> Starting afsd > > >> /Library/StartupItems/OpenAFS/OpenAFS: line 41: 1158 Bus > > >> error $AFSD $OPTIONS > > >> > > >> > > >> Any idea? > > > > > > We've seen this as well, on a G5 that was upgraded directly from 10.3 > > > (and OpenAFS 1.4.1). AFS *did* work after the upgrade, then broke. > > > A look at /Library/Receipts reveals that the CHUD package was > > > installed, > > > and since that loads a few kernel extensions > > > (com.apple.iokit.CHUDKernLib, > > > com.apple.iokit.CHUDProf, com.apple.iokit.CHUDUtils) it's a rather > > > obvious > > > suspect. > > > > > > What does kextstat print out on your system? > > > > > > the suspect form kextstat is > > > > >> 126 0 0x4d41d000 0xa1000 0xa0000 > > org.openafs.filesystems.afs (1.5.27) <6 5 2> > > > > > > I have clearly uninstalled the 1.5.27, before installing 1.4.5, and > > the uninstall command said that it finished OK, but it > > probably did not worked well ... > > > > 1.4.5 should if it succeeded install over the 1.5.27 kext anyway. > > > > > I removed the 1.5.27 kext from the kernel cache, via the command > > sudo touch /System/Library/Extensions > > and the 1.4.5 did not install. > Then I run the 1.5.27 uninstall and 1.4.5 did not work. > Then I run the 1.4.5 uninstall and 1.4.5 did not work. > > Always it send the message "You cannot install OpenAFS on this volume. A > newer version of this software already exists on this volume." > > some hint? thanks. >
