> John Hascall wrote: > > Would it work to modify the KDC such that when it hands out > > an afs/<cell>@REALM ticket for a TGT with a client name that > > is in the sconv table (like my sysadmin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > that it 'K4-izes' that name (to sysadmin/asw in this case) in the > > returned ticket? (Thus obviating the need to futz with the code > > on every AFS server.)
> > Or is that just too hideous? > Sounds like the tail waging the dog. There are KDCs used with AFS > that are not modifiable, and don't support any k4. You don't want to > fiddle with the K5 protocols either. the Its time to get AFS 'k5-izes'. Yes, it would be lovely if AFS was 100% K5. (If it was, all this would already be working!) But, that's not something *I* can make happen. I can, however, modify my KDC. And I'm not sure why I would (a) care about KDCs used with AFS that are not modifiable, or (b) care about lack of K4 support in the KDC. John _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
