On Dec 17, 2007 1:34 PM, Adam Megacz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Matt Benjamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I have wondered whether either is necessary. For most operations, > > libadmin doesn't need a kernel. > > Sure, but AFAIK it is the only way to get programmatic access to the > "fs" command suite (like "fs la"). The two near-term projects I'm > interested in using this for are: > > - "transitive fs la" and some other ACL-troubleshooting tools for > novices >
Technically, you *could* provide a mini-(dummy)-cache-manager in an fs-workalike that meant you could just make RPCs directly from it with no kernel. I think Chaskiel already has all the code for this in some variant of afscp.
