I thought the initial RO volume should be on the same server as the RW volume.. for performance.
The person who had my position before I got here had an afs tools server (development environment) RW and RO, home RW server, home RO server And two VLservers. I'm going to request an additional servers, split the home directories across eng02 RW RO and eng03 RW RO , and add an additional Server for RO and backup volumes only. ________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derrick Brashear Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 12:06 PM To: OpenAFS Info Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] can someone point me in the right direction on cleaning up RO volumes? On Dec 19, 2007 11:33 AM, Jerry Normandin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, My AFS deployment is much faster now that I've been cleaning up the vldb. One problem is that I noticed that many of the RO and RW volumes are on the same server. ( I didn't do it, I inherited this) It's good practice to have at least one RO on the RW site, so, leave it be. So I want to migrate the RO volumes from ENG03 to ENG02. But there is a catch, When I list my VLDB I see this: add a second site, keep the first, release the volume.
