On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:28:17 -0800 Jeffrey Altman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Although I think "No space left on device" is rather clear, is > > there a reason why EDQUOT is not returned instead? Does the > > fileserver response just not differentiate between a full > > volume/partition/directory table? > > If you look in the code you will see that platforms that define EDQUOT > on the client will use EDQUOT on the client. The file server always > returns VOVERQUOTA for a quota error. > > See src/afs/afs_error.c Indeed it does. I didn't know there was anything of approximate modernity to Solaris 8 or newer that didn't define EDQUOT... isn't that part of POSIX.1? -- Andrew Deason [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
