On Jan 31, 2008 1:42 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Derrick Brashear wrote: > > > On Jan 31, 2008 11:49 AM, gaurav gunjan jha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > >> > >> Hi all, > >> We are having problems while installing the first afs server machine on > >> scientific linux 4.4 .we have used afs server and client rpms for > >> installation. > > 4.4 is ancient. If it still has to be SL4, why not at least 4.5? And if it > doesn't, I'd really recommend 5.1 for a new AFS server. It comes with > packages for the latest OpenAFS release. SL4.x will get those a bit later. >
ok, so: > > > which rpms? i suggest the 1.4.6 rpms on the openafs.org web site, if you > get > > rhel4 rpms we should even have a module for your kernel. > > He's probably using the SL RPMs. Gaurav, if that's true, this discussion > should be taken over to the scientific-linux-users list since the init > script has been quite different from the one in the openafs.org packages > for a while. We'll send you back here once we've sorted out the issues > specific to SL ;-) And just to be sure: This is not a recommendation not > to grab and use the EL4 packages from openafs.org instead of the ones > coming with SL. But whichever you use, it would be best to address the > corresponding mailing list first with these questions. fhs instead of transarc, i guess, is the difference?
