On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 7:33 PM, Darren Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Simon Wilkinson wrote: > > > > On 14 Feb 2008, at 00:49, Darren Patterson wrote: > > > >> After building new kmod packages for the latest RHEL5 kernel I > >> discovered that rpm is very unhappy with the naming convention. Yum > >> refuses to install the package claiming that > > > >> kmod-openafs-1.4.5-2.2.6.18_53.1.4.el5 is newer than > > > >> kmod-openafs-1.4.5-1.2.6.18_53.1.13.el5. > > > > If these are literally what you've got, then something odd has > > happened. Note the leading '1' in the release string of the second RPM > > name, compared to the 2 which leads the release of the first kernel > > module. > Yes. At some point there was an openafs-1.4.5-rhel4.2.src.rpm on the > site which I downloaded and used to build packages. At some later > point, after I had rebuilt several VM guests, that package was gone (and > I didn't notice) and only a rhel4.1.src.rpm was present, which I > subsequently used to build newer kmod packages which won't install. > > Will you be putting up 1.4.6 srpms?
You mean like: http://www.openafs.org/dl/openafs/1.4.6/openafs-1.4.6-1.1.src.rpm It's linked with the rest of the source from the release page. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
