"Christopher D. Clausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> Knowing that, I expect to revert that patch -- unless someone >>> can come up with a very good argument for the new behavior. >>> >>> Out of curiosity, how have you used it? >> >> Usually to tell whether two shells are in different PAGs, which is >> useful when hunting down problems with AFS PAM modules and the like. >> Also to tell whether a process is in a PAG at all, although with >> current Linux kernels the keyring is the canonical place where that's >> stored. > > Would a --pag option be acceptable to allow continued use for debugging > while allowing the patched behaviour for those who do not know better?
Thanks, but I see no need for a new option. Better just to revert the change. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
