Robert Banz wrote:

On May 13, 2008, at 8:57 AM, Rich Sudlow wrote:

When creating partitons using zfs on Solaris that are larger than
1000 GB I see negative values returned -  Is this a zfs
issue due to it being 128 bit?  Due to the changes coming in
1.5 this (in addition to the 2 TB partition/volume limit)
should go away...correct?

I "fixed" the problem by carving up my pool into multiple /vicep* mountpoints and setting an appropriate < 2TB quota on each.

-rob

Thanks Rob

I also did that as your talk last year shows - however
whenever the /vicep* partition goes over 1000GB I get
negative numbers - not sure why..as you can
see Sun Volume Manager seems to work - do you
(or anyone else on this list) have zfs
/vicep* partitions larger than 1000 GB?


e.g.

df shows

# df -h | grep vicep
/dev/md/dsk/d30        790G   3.0G   779G     1%    /vicepz
vicepa                 500G    28K   500G     1%    /vicepa
tank/vicepb           1000G    77K  1000G     1%    /vicepb
/dev/md/dsk/d50        1.8T    64M   1.8T     1%    /vicepx
tank/vicepc            1.5T    67K   1.5T     1%    /vicepc
#

# zfs list -r tank
NAME          USED  AVAIL  REFER  MOUNTPOINT
tank          339K  8.87T  60.9K  /tank
tank/vicepb  77.0K  1000G  77.0K  /vicepb
tank/vicepc  67.1K  1.50T  67.1K  /vicepc




hpl.cc.nd.edu{rich}35: vos partinfo thumper03
Free space on partition /vicepa: 524287910 K blocks out of total 524287938
Free space on partition /vicepb: 1048575922 K blocks out of total 1048576000
Free space on partition /vicepc: -536870973 K blocks out of total -536870912
Free space on partition /vicepx: 1933579464 K blocks out of total 1933645048
Free space on partition /vicepz: 817272810 K blocks out of total 820411952
hpl.cc.nd.edu{rich}36:


Thanks,

Rich



--
Rich Sudlow
University of Notre Dame
Center for Research Computing
128 Information Technology Center
PO Box 539
Notre Dame, IN 46556-0539

(574) 631-7258 office phone
(574) 631-9283 office fax

_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info

Reply via email to