It seems to me there is possibly some confusion of terminology here...
There should be no way that the iSCSI target drives themselves should be listed in the VLDB. If additional ethernet cards were added to the server to connect to the iSCSI targets, they would be treated the same as any other ethernet interface, since they're just carrying TCP/IP traffic. If clients have viable routes to the added ethernet interfaces in the server, the openafs traffic might reduce the bandwidth available to the iSCSI connections, but other than that it should work.
If the clients don't have viable routes to the additional ethernet interfaces on the server, but are still trying to use those addresses, there's something else going on....
Ken Aaker _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
