> I think there are some open issues in the foundation space relating to > the TAC, and final details of what will really exist, and exactly when > the foundation will begin to exist formally. With regard to the TAC > specifically, there seems to be an open question about how many seats it > will have, eligibility/karma required to sit, and how the number of > seats allocated to community members (which I believe would include all > people I know to be probably interested in participating) would relate > to seats allocated to corporate or sponsor members. > > So I'm highlighting those items for further discussion. > > I'd say for myself that if this is the way the community plans to move > forward, that it might not be a bad idea for the community to simply get > started organizing an informal proto-TAC and see what issues it's going > to present, and what opportunities it may offer.
Speaking again for myself only, I think such a thing where organizations likely to join the foundation as sponsor and non-sponsor members get seated (as do community members) until the foundation exists and we formally compose the TAC based on actual eligibility is somewhat desirable. Derrick _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
