On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Evan Macbeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Absolutely and understood. I wasn't talking about replacing anything already
>>> in place or the community! I was simply supporting moving the TAC from
>>> "idea" to "implementation."
>>
>> The most important aspect of the TAC is the use of the TAC in
>> combination with OpenAFS membership to generate funds that
>> can be used to support the infrastructure and processes of the
>> organization.
>
> Oh, I had thought the Technical Advisory Council was responsible for
> technical advice,

Me too.

> I did not realize it was a fundraising body.

Me either. But if they want to go out and gather funds it'd be foolish
of us to stop them.
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info

Reply via email to