On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:10 PM, Dale Ghent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 1, 2008, at 4:24 AM, Rainer Toebbicke wrote: > >> With unlimited development resources AFS would deserve a better suited >> protocol than TCP, in practice with a little more realism my gut feeling is >> that at least some more brain should be devoted to improving plain RX rather >> than betting on another horse. I occasionally tried over the past years, >> with some improvements that Hartmut tested as well, but my brain being what >> it is and the matter relatively complicated results remain modest. > > Given this, what are your thoughts on STCP and whether it would be useful in > this arena?
SCTP. At this point it may have critical mass of platforms we support and thus be a viable option. That I know of the Windows options for it are slim. There is a MacOS version from KAME, but I don't know the licensing details. Since it doesn't ship with the OS (and in any case where it doesn't) that's a practical consideration. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
