On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Tom Maher wrote:
What's the semantics for negative ACLs? For example,
fs sa . system:authuser rl
fs sa . badguy +rl -negative
I'm guessing that'll give badguy negative "rl" bits.
Makes sense to me.
Should 'fs sa . badguy -rl' implicitly give him negative "rl" bits, if
he doesn't have anything already?
That doesn't make sense to me. I'd suggest that -<perm> should never add
permissions, only remove. So it should just clear the perms if they're set
and do nothing if not. To add the negative flags, do what you suggested
above.
My $0.02.
Cheers,
Stephen.
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
