On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 17:10, Rich Sudlow <[email protected]> wrote: > Esther Filderman wrote: >> >> To some degree, OpenAFS will always write slower than standard NFS, >> because AFS is actually making sure it's not writing crap. NFS will >> happily write stuff at blazingly fast speeds, not caring whether the >> data it writes is sane or corrupted. > > The reason NFS appears to be faster is because you're not doing an > apple - apples comparision - if you were you would have to turn off > attribute caching on NFS - at that point you'd find that performance > is essentially equal
Why would you turn off attribute caching? That is a part of NFS. Why would attribute caching make the test be an apples - oranges comparison? _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
