On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Will Maier <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Derrick- > > On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 04:42:05PM -0500, Derrick Brashear wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Will Maier <[email protected]> wrote: >> > In the past, we've observed prolonged periods where one or more of >> > our servers would report more than 200 calls waiting for a thread. >> > This occurred again this morning and lasted for about four hours. >> >> bos status (fileserverhost) fs -long >> >> and post that information? > > Here's what I get: > > Instance fs, (type is fs) currently running normally. > Auxiliary status is: file server running. > Process last started at Wed Feb 4 12:01:36 2009 (6 proc starts) > Last exit at Wed Feb 4 12:01:36 2009 > Command 1 is '/usr/afs/bin/fileserver'
which means you have some very small number of threads -p 128, for starters, would make life much better, but... > Command 2 is '/usr/afs/bin/volserver' > Command 3 is '/usr/afs/bin/salvager' > > Here's what top says currently: > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > 3084 root 11 -5 204m 17m 1216 S 174 0.2 299:30.71 fileserver > > And, for good measure, here's what rxdbebug shows for the server, too: > > Free packets: 242, packet reclaims: 202, calls: 120829063, used FDs: 64 > not waiting for packets. > 226 calls waiting for a thread > 2 threads are idle > > >> However, lots of bugs which would affect this fixed since 1.4.1, >> which is ancient. > > Indeed. We've been upgrading within RHEL releases so far, but we're > planning to jump from RHEL4 (sigh) to RHEL5 (finally) in the near > future. That should, at a glance, get us to at least 1.4.7. 1.4.8 exists for RHEL5, and RHEL4.... _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
