-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Harald Barth wrote:
>> I know you're not supposed to use AFS for database-like things, but it seems
>> that if I can't even unpack a tarball without corruption, there's some sort 
>> of
>> problem that needs to be resolved.
> 
> True.
> 
>>  fairly diverse range of Linux distributions.
> 
> What file system type(s) do you use for AFS caches? I use ext2 or
> ext3. Because the cache does not contain anything that _must_ survive
> a reboot (unless you use the experimental disconnected features in
> 1.5.x), I suggest ext2 for speed. I had really bad experiences with
> reiserfs.

AFAIK you need to use a fs WITHOUT a journal for cache partitions, so
far I only use ext2. I do not know if that is resolved or not.

For me/our cell, we run still 1.4.7 (and older clients) and have not
seen a data corruptness for years AFAIR.

> Harald.

MfG,
Lars Schimmer
- --
- -------------------------------------------------------------
TU Graz, Institut für ComputerGraphik & WissensVisualisierung
Tel: +43 316 873-5405       E-Mail: [email protected]
Fax: +43 316 873-5402       PGP-Key-ID: 0x4A9B1723
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkmT+rIACgkQmWhuE0qbFyOAdwCeNXwhzVe/guw+bOCUTT9+YY4u
VisAmwa8LqkvVJjWLMPLPy+f5+Hr3gTa
=0k7q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info

Reply via email to