Harald Barth wrote:
Does anyone have any information on which versions of solaris 10
are not safe? Any direction to a bug report or a mail list thread
would be appreciated.
I think the sneaky thing was that
a) UFS with logging may rot your files
b) Some update made logging the default mount option
I don't think ZFS is safe either.
Correct. We use the namei and our vice partitions are now in ZFS.
Note the OpenAFS distributions:
http://www.openafs.org/dl/openafs/1.4.10/solaris-10/sun4x_510.tar.gz
was built with:
./configure --enable-transarc-paths \
--with-krb5=yes \
--enable-namei-fileserver \
--enable-largefile-fileserver \
--host=sparc-sun-solaris2.10
Harald.
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
--
Douglas E. Engert <[email protected]>
Argonne National Laboratory
9700 South Cass Avenue
Argonne, Illinois 60439
(630) 252-5444
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
