> My feeling is that #define RX_MAX_FRAG 1 instead of 4 does make > things > behave better if there is packet loss to be expected.
I'll try this. I noticed by searching about this field the existence of a "jumbo" flag : I suppose it is not in official releases yet, since /sbin/afsd -help doesn't mention it? (and using it gives an error...) > > About xDSL: > > It might be the case that the throttling of TCP compared to the > throttling > of rx (over UDP) looses when xDSL is involved. That is very difficult > to > predict without actually monitoring the packets on the wire in > question. > > Another guess: It might be that your xDSL allways behaves shitty > (like > gets very long latency) when it gets near full. It might be that your > provicer tunnels your xDSL over some other transport somewhere. I had the same problem with 2 different providers (one in a large city, one in in landscape), but I'll try some upload benchmarks... Thanks again for your help. Frédéric Grelot. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
